Accessibility

This site targets WCAG 2.2 Level AA. This statement says what has actually been checked, rather than asserting conformance in general.

What has been done

Every text and interface colour pair is computed against its real background, not estimated. The lowest ratio used for body text is 6.15:1 against the page ground. Two colours in the palette are restricted to decorative rules and are never allowed to carry text.
Pages reflow at a 320 CSS-pixel viewport without horizontal scrolling, measured on all ten. The one exception is the table on the pricing page, which scrolls sideways inside its own container — a data table is the case WCAG 1.4.10 explicitly allows to do that, and the container is reachable by keyboard so it can actually be scrolled.
The header stops sticking on short and narrow viewports. It wraps to as much as 157 pixels tall on a phone, which was enough to completely hide a focused link behind it.
Every page has one h1 and a heading order with no skipped levels; a skip link moves focus to the main landmark.
Focus is always visible, and the indicator switches to white on every dark band — the hero, the two dark strips and the footer — where the default would otherwise sit at 1.8:1 against the background.
Lists that have their markers removed carry role="list", so Safari does not strip the list semantics from them.
Decorative rules are re-drawn as borders under Windows High Contrast Mode, where background colours are discarded — otherwise the structure of the page would vanish for the people relying on that mode.
The contact form has real labels, is usable without JavaScript, and reports errors as text on an accessible page with your answers still filled in — never as a bare error code.
Animation is gated behind prefers-reduced-motion. In practice there is almost none to gate.

How this was checked

Colour pairs were computed rather than eyeballed, and reflow was measured in a browser at 320 × 256 rather than assumed — headless browsers report a minimum layout width that hides the problem. An accessibility review of this site found three real failures, all now fixed: an invisible focus ring on the footer, a table no keyboard user could scroll, and the sticky header above.

Known limitations

No independent third-party accessibility audit has been carried out on this site. The review described above was our own.
The send.legal application at app.send.legal is a separate interface and is not covered by this statement.
PDFs produced by the product have not yet had a PDF/UA tagging review.

Report a barrier

If something here is unusable for you, tell us and we will fix it: hello@send.legal. Describe the page and what happened; we do not need you to identify the guideline.